Why local American police have so much military gear at protests

Protests continue to take place across the country calling for an end to racism and police brutality, following the death of George Floyd while in police custody.

And American cops are using some heavy duty equipment that they’ve inherited from the military.

The equipment used by some local police — ranging from tear gas grenade launchers to bayonets — are part of the federal 1033 Program, which transfers surplus equipment from the armed forces to civilian law enforcement agencies.

“This is typically stuff that they weren’t buying on their own — they wouldn’t consider it a budget priority,” Cato Institute Senior Fellow Walter Olson told Yahoo Finance’s YFi PM (video above).  But “once you’ve got the gear, the temptation is to use it… we have seen the results — we have seen armored vehicles… we’ve seen grenade launchers, helicopters that turn protests into something closer to a war zone.” 

A Miami Police officer watches protestors from a armored vehicle during a rally in response to the recent death of George Floyd in Miami, Florida on May 31, 2020. (Photo: RICARDO ARDUENGO/AFP via Getty Images)

Lawmakers call for 1033 program to be shut down

The tide may be turning against the de facto police militarization.

Earlier this week, former Vice President Joe Biden slammed the program during his speech in Philadelphia, calling for it to be ended among new reforms.

“There are other measures: to stop transferring weapons of war to police forces, to improve oversight and accountability, to create a model use of force standard — that also should be made law this month,” Biden said. “No more excuses. No more delays.”

Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI) supported the sentiment, tweeting before Biden’s speech that he planned to introduce an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act to discontinue the program. There is bipartisan support for the effort.

History of the 1033 program

The program was created in 1989 and made permanent in 1996 as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

In 2015, after the police in Ferguson, Missouri used military equipment when responding to protesters, former President Barack Obama signed an executive order to improve oversight over this program and prohibited the transfer of items like bayonets, tracked armored vehicles, and grenade launchers

President Donald Trump reversed that order in 2017 and fully restored the program.

The itch to reach for these military weapons gets worse because of the ease of accessibility, Olson said, adding that “we’ve seen tension diffused because the police got out there and talked to demonstrators and they began realizing that that they agreed on things and this was one community together. It’s harder to do that when you’re militarized.” 

Seattle police drive by protesters in an armored vehicle during a protest against the death in Minneapolis police custody of George Floyd, in Seattle, Washington, U.S. May 31, 2020. (PHOTO: REUTERS/Lindsey Wasson)

The Law Enforcement Support Office, which oversees the process, maintains a spreadsheet on its website that details items transferred, many of them run-of-the-mill office expenses such as screw drivers, pens, shirts, bandage kits, sleeping pages.

But some police departments got their hands on some pricey items. 

A police department in Patterson, Georgia was shipped a $950,000 RV simulator mobile. (A department in Waxahachie, Texas, cancelled a shipment of a SIMULATOR ASSEMBLY,RVS MOBILE.)

Police department in Okeechobee County, Florida, Otero County, Colorado, Blount County, Tennessee, and others, were all shipped mine resistant vehicles valued at more than $700,000 each. A police department West Deer Township in Pennsylvania was shipped an explosive ordinance removal robot worth nearly $300,000. 

“For a long time, there was bipartisan support for the these programs because local police departments like the free stuff, and they have a powerful voice,” Olson explained. “more recently there has been this partisan divide which Obama and the Democrats have grown skeptical [as they listen to people]… who say this changes the dynamic — it changes it from neighbors facing off against neighbors … [to] they are more like.. an occupying army.”

A man rides a bicycle up to a law enforcement checkpoint after the city endured a night of protests and violence on May 29, 2020 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. (Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images)

It’s not clear if the LESO spreadsheet is missing records of shipments, as noted by Wired recently. And the other issue is that the law enforcement getting the shipments don’t actually have training from the Department of Defense. 

“We never, never want that to be the relationship between … the police and the populace in the U.S. — that has never what been America aspired to,” Olsen said.

Private companies involved in 1033

The 1033 program is not just a relationship between the Department of Defense and local police departments — it also includes private sector partnerships.

In 2012, Verizon, Panasonic, and another company had outfitted a humvee that the National Sheriff’s Association had acquired through the 1033 program with wireless technology.

(Screenshot: National Sheriffs’ Association)

“The Humvee has been outfitted with modern crime fighting equipment to include Verizon’s 4G LTE technology; reliable Panasonic technology for public safety; and Rontan emergency lighting,” the website stated.

AT&T and Harley Davidson are also listed alongside Verizon as “Platinum Partners” on NSA’s website (Verizon is Yahoo Finance’s parent company).

Militarizing the conflict erodes a ‘trusted bond’

Though President Trump suggested deploying the military to quell protests across the country, military officials, including former Secretary of Defense James Mattis — who resigned from the Trump administration in December 2018 — condemned the temptation to deploy the military in response to thhe ongoing protests.

A DC Police officer stands on the back of a police cruiser with smashed windows as he aims a non-lethal launcher at protestors as they clash with Police after the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis Police in Washington, D.C. on May 31, 2020. (Photo: Samuel Corum / AFP)

“When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside,” Mattis wrote in The Atlantic.

“At home, we should use our military only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors,” Mattis added. “Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, D.C., sets up a conflict—a false conflict—between the military and civilian society.”

Aarthi is a reporter at Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Twitter @aarthiswami

Zack Guzman contributed to this report. Follow him on Twitter @zGuz.

Read more:

Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, SmartNews, LinkedIn,YouTube, and reddit.

Source Article